Fact Check: Is Telangana Rising Vision 2047 Really 92% Made by ChatGPT? Here’s What the Evidence Shows
Munsif News 24×7: A screenshot circulating on social media claims that the Telangana Rising Vision 2047 document was “92% made by ChatGPT.” The screenshot provides no details — no tool used, no method of analysis, and no supporting evidence. Despite this, the claim is being shared widely to cast doubt on a policy document prepared through months of research, expert consultations, and planning.
Table of Contents
Fact-checking reveals that the claim is misleading, baseless, and scientifically unreliable.
Why the “92% ChatGPT Content” Claim Is Not Credible
1. AI Detectors Are Not Reliable
Studies across the world show that AI-detector tools:
- Frequently flag human-written content as AI-generated
- Struggle with technical, academic, and policy-style writing
- Produce inconsistent results even on the same text
- Are widely considered unfit for official verification
Many universities abroad have stopped using AI detectors because of their high false-positive rate, often above 50%.
2. Government Documents Confuse AI Detectors
Policy documents like Telangana Rising Vision 2047:
- Use formal language
- Repeat key terms and policy headings
- Follow structured and methodical writing patterns
These characteristics often trigger AI detectors incorrectly, causing them to misread authentic human-written content as “AI-style writing.”
3. Indian English Poses Additional Challenges
AI detectors are mostly trained on Western English styles.
They often fail to recognize:
- Indian sentence structure
- Government writing formats
- Region-specific terminology
This makes their results even more unreliable when applied to Indian documents.
4. Testing Vision 2047 Sections Shows Human Writing
When portions of the Vision 2047 document were tested using multiple tools, some detectors clearly identified them as human-written, confirming what global research already states:
AI detectors cannot be trusted to determine authorship.
Without proper forensic linguistic analysis, claims like “92% AI-written” are meaningless.
5. Screenshot With No Source ≠ Evidence
The viral screenshot:
- Does not show which tool was used
- Does not show how the analysis was done
- Provides no timestamp, methodology, or verification
This makes it nothing more than a political gimmick designed to spread confusion and undermine a legitimate policy document.
Fact Check Summary
- The claim of “92% ChatGPT-written” is unsupported.
- AI detectors are unreliable and inconsistent.
- Policy documents naturally trigger AI detectors due to formal writing patterns.
- Expert reviews and partial tests show human-written content.
- A random screenshot cannot discredit a comprehensive development document.
The claim that Telangana Rising Vision 2047 is 92% made by ChatGPT has no factual basis and relies on unreliable tools and unverified screenshots. Discussions around Vision 2047 should focus on policies, ideas, and real data, not misinformation or misused AI detection tools.
