Google Maps Under Scrutiny After Tragic Bareilly Bridge Incident: Why Did It Fail?

Bareilly: In a tragic incident in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, three men lost their lives after the vehicle they were traveling in plunged into a river. They were reportedly following directions provided by Google Maps on November 23, 2024.

The victims were en route to a wedding when the accident occurred, and the incident has raised serious concerns about the reliability of Google Maps, a widely used navigation app in India and around the world.

This tragedy adds to an alarming trend of accidents where over-reliance on navigation technology has led to fatal outcomes.

The Incident: What Happened in Bareilly?

Nitin Kumar, along with his relatives Ajit Kumar and Amit, were traveling from Gurugram to Bareilly on a Saturday night. They were guided by Google Maps and took a bridge over the Ramganga River near Khallpur village. Unbeknownst to them, the bridge had been partially destroyed in floods earlier in September 2023 and was no longer passable. The incomplete structure caused their vehicle to plunge into the river, resulting in the death of all three occupants.

Satellite images confirmed that part of the bridge had collapsed a year before the accident, but Google Maps, along with other mapping services like MapMyIndia’s Mappls and Bhuvan, continued to list the route as passable. Local reports revealed that the entrance to the bridge had been sealed off with a nearly four-foot wall, which was later partially demolished, further complicating the situation.

How Does Google Maps Work and Why Did It Fail?

Google Maps is one of the most trusted navigation tools globally, relied upon by millions of people for everyday travel. The app uses a combination of algorithms and real-time data to suggest the most efficient routes. While the exact technology behind Google Maps is proprietary, it primarily utilizes Dijkstra’s Algorithm to calculate the shortest path between two points, considering factors like distance, traffic conditions, and real-time road data.

The Key Data Sources of Google Maps

Google Maps aggregates data from two main sources:

1. Real-time User Data: Data collected from users of the app who share their location and movement patterns.
2. Authoritative Geospatial Data: Information from local authorities, including government agencies, which can indicate road closures, construction zones, accidents, or other disruptions. Google Maps’ “Update Road” feature allows users to report changes such as road closures or missing streets.

Google also collaborates with private organizations and government bodies to obtain accurate geospatial data about roads, speed limits, tolls, and road restrictions. This partnership is crucial for ensuring that the app provides timely and accurate route suggestions. However, in this case, it seems that Google Maps failed to account for the collapse of the Bareilly bridge, a significant oversight.

The Question of Data Sharing and Accuracy

One of the issues raised following the Bareilly incident is the lack of clarity regarding data sharing between local authorities and Google Maps. According to a senior traffic police officer in Bareilly, there was no indication that the local traffic or road data had been shared with Google. Moreover, government agencies might be reluctant to share public data with private companies due to ethical and legal concerns about commercial use.

Also Read | Dubai Cafe’s Rs 1 Lakh ‘Gold Karak’ Tea Goes Viral: Watch the Luxurious Tea Experience

Although Google Maps is free for individual users, the company profits by providing mapping and navigation solutions to large businesses, such as food delivery companies, e-commerce firms, and ride-sharing services. This creates a potential conflict of interest when it comes to how government bodies collaborate with the tech giant in sharing public data.

Ethical Concerns and Accountability

Experts argue that this tragic incident could have been avoided. Amit Yadav, who heads the National Road Safety Mission, criticized Google Maps for not flagging the bridge as unsafe despite its collapse over a year ago. According to Yadav, Google Maps’ algorithm should have recognized that the bridge had not been used for over a year and should not have recommended the route.

Local authorities were also criticized for not posting adequate signage to indicate that the bridge was non-functional. The entrance to the bridge, used by the victims, was reportedly sealed off, but the app still listed it as a viable route.

A Growing Concern: The Dangers of Over-Reliance on Navigation Apps

This incident highlights a growing concern about the over-reliance on navigation apps like Google Maps, which have become integral to daily commutes and long-distance travel. Many people place unquestioning trust in these apps, assuming that they are always accurate and up-to-date. However, as seen in this case, they are not infallible.

The Bareilly tragedy is not an isolated case. There have been similar incidents across the country where users followed routes suggested by navigation apps, only to find that the road was closed, under construction, or impassable. The lack of real-time, localized data sharing between authorities and tech companies may contribute to these failures.

Google Maps and Other Navigation Apps: A Shared Responsibility

The Bareilly incident also underscores that this problem is not unique to Google Maps alone. Other navigation platforms, including MapMyIndia’s Mappls and Bhuvan, also showed the route as passable, even though the bridge was destroyed. This suggests that the issue lies not just with one company, but with the broader reliance on user-generated data and the lack of real-time, authoritative data from local authorities.

Government and Corporate Responsibility

Experts argue that both government authorities and corporate tech giants like Google have a role to play in ensuring that navigation services are accurate and safe for users. Governments must be proactive in sharing real-time road data with companies like Google, while tech companies must ensure that they are continuously updating their maps with the most accurate and reliable data.

In response to the incident, a Google spokesperson expressed their condolences and confirmed that the company is working closely with authorities to investigate the issue. However, Google did not provide a specific answer to questions about data sharing with local authorities in India, leaving many questions unanswered.

Conclusion: A Call for Improved Safety and Accountability

The Bareilly bridge tragedy serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers of over-relying on navigation apps. While these apps are invaluable tools, users must be aware that they are not always foolproof. It is crucial for both tech companies and government agencies to collaborate more effectively to ensure that road data is accurate, up-to-date, and safe for public use. Only then can we prevent further tragedies and ensure the safety of all who rely on these services for travel.