Supreme Court Allows Gyanvapi Mosque ASI Survey: No Interference, No Harm to Mosque

In a significant turn of events, the Supreme Court’s recent decision regarding the Gyanvapi mosque ASI survey has garnered attention. The apex court’s stance upholds the order of the Allahabad High Court and ensures that the survey will proceed without causing harm to the mosque’s structure.

This decision has not only legal implications but also historical and cultural significance, setting the stage for a comprehensive examination of the site’s heritage and identity.

Allahabad High Court’s Approval and ASI Survey

The Allahabad High Court’s approval of a scientific survey at the Gyanvapi mosque marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing dispute. The court dismissed a challenge by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid committee against a lower court’s order for the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) survey. This decision comes with a key condition: the survey should not involve any digging on the premises, thereby ensuring the protection of the mosque’s physical integrity.

Supreme Court’s Support and ASI’s Assurance

The Supreme Court’s backing of the ASI survey and its refusal to interfere with the High Court’s order speaks volumes about the significance of preserving historical and archaeological heritage. The court’s decision reflects a careful consideration of ASI’s assurances that no harm will come to the mosque during the survey. It’s noteworthy that non-invasive methods will be employed in the survey, further ensuring the protection of the site’s sanctity.

High Court’s Direction and Modern Techniques

The Allahabad High Court’s direction for a comprehensive survey, assisted by local administration, reflects a commitment to modern techniques and accurate proceedings. This decision underscores the importance of using technology to delve into the historical layers of the site. The court’s focus on preserving the mosque’s essence while conducting the survey demonstrates a balance between historical exploration and cultural sensitivity.

Legal Proceedings and Future Steps

While the ASI survey is set to take place, legal proceedings continue to shape the narrative around the Gyanvapi mosque case. The committee overseeing the mosque’s affairs appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court’s decision. The Supreme Court’s decision to transfer the case to the Varanasi district judge underscores the need for an experienced approach to the trial. This move aims to ensure a fair trial that benefits all parties involved.

Historical Context and Cultural Identity

The Gyanvapi mosque case is not only a legal matter but also a reflection of the historical context and cultural identity intertwined with the site. Hindu activists assert the presence of an earlier temple, raising questions about the site’s history and the layers of its past. The court’s decision to prevent harm during the survey underscores the commitment to preserving the site’s heritage while respecting its cultural significance.

---

The Supreme Court’s support for the ASI survey at Gyanvapi mosque reflects a balanced approach to preserving historical, cultural, and legal aspects. This decision not only facilitates a comprehensive archaeological survey but also showcases the court’s commitment to maintaining the sanctity of the site. As the legal proceedings continue, the Gyanvapi mosque case remains a pivotal discussion point in India’s legal and cultural landscape.